WS_2027_Review form_WS_María De Los Ángeles GONZÁLEZ COULON, Mary BELOFF, David SAN MARTÍN SEGURA, Julia CARCELLER STELLA, Matija ŽGUR, Pamela TEUTLI ELIZONDO and Ruth M. MESTRE I MESTRE

Name of reviewer: *

Title: "Los prismas del conflicto familiar: una mirada desde el proceso"

COORDINATORS: MARÍA DE LOS ÁNGELES GONZÁLEZ COULON and JESÚS EZURMENDIA ÁLVAREZ. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Justicia sin exclusiones: acceso a la justicia, vulnerabilidad, interseccionalidad y métodos alternativos de resolución de conflictos. Una perspectiva comparada América Latina – Europa"

COORDINATORS: MARY BELOFF and LAURA LORA. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "La frontera algorítmica: la Inteligencia Artificial en las transformaciones de la gestión migratoria en Europa"

COORDINATORS: DAVID SAN MARTÍN SEGURAD and MIGUEL ANGEL PRESNO LINERA. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Un modelo para la evaluación de impacto normativo en Euskadi construido desde la sociología jurídica"

COORDINATORS: JULIA CARCELLER STELLA. She is not part of the Institute's research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Penal humanism in the Age of Rights Constitutionalism"

COORDINATORS: MATIJA ŽGUR and DARIO IPPOLITO. None of the organisers are involved in the institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Enseñar Derecho en tiempos de crisis: inteligencia artificial, debilitamiento institucional y pensamiento crítico"

COORDINATORS: PAMELA TEUTLI ELIZONDO and JUAN JESÚS GARZA ONOFRE. None of the organisers are involved in the institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Listening Across Justice Zones"

COORDINATORS: RUTH M. MESTRE I MESTRE, SARAH AILWOOD, NATALIE KYNESWOOD and BONNIE GORDON. Ruth Mestre i Mestre is part of the research line HUMAN RIGHTS / GENDER

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Overall scoring: *

Considering my above scores and comments for the applications I was assigned to review, I arrive at the following ranking of the selected applications:

	A (best)	B (medium)	C (lowest)
Los prismas del conflicto familiar: una mirada desde el proceso *	Los prismas del conflicto familiar: una mirada desde el proceso - A (best)	Los prismas del conflicto familiar: una mirada desde el proceso - B (medium)	Los prismas del conflicto familiar: una mirada desde el proceso - C (lowest)
Justicia sin exclusiones: acceso a la justicia.. *	Justicia sin exclusiones: acceso a la justicia.. - A (best)	Justicia sin exclusiones: acceso a la justicia.. - B (medium)	Justicia sin exclusiones: acceso a la justicia.. - C (lowest)
La frontera algorítmica: la Inteligencia Artificial en las transformaciones de la gestión migratoria en Europa *	La frontera algorítmica: la Inteligencia Artificial en las transformaciones de la gestión migratoria en Europa - A (best)	La frontera algorítmica: la Inteligencia Artificial en las transformaciones de la gestión migratoria en Europa - B (medium)	La frontera algorítmica: la Inteligencia Artificial en las transformaciones de la gestión migratoria en Europa - C (lowest)
Un modelo para la evaluación de impacto normativo en Euskadi construido desde la sociología jurídica *	Un modelo para la evaluación de impacto normativo en Euskadi construido desde la sociología jurídica - A (best)	Un modelo para la evaluación de impacto normativo en Euskadi construido desde la sociología jurídica - B (medium)	Un modelo para la evaluación de impacto normativo en Euskadi construido desde la sociología jurídica - C (lowest)
Penal humanism in the Age of Rights Constitutionalism *	Penal humanism in the Age of Rights Constitutionalism - A (best)	Penal humanism in the Age of Rights Constitutionalism - B (medium)	Penal humanism in the Age of Rights Constitutionalism - C (lowest)
Enseñar Derecho en tiempos de crisis: inteligencia artificial, debilitamiento institucional y pensamiento crítico *	Enseñar Derecho en tiempos de crisis: inteligencia artificial, debilitamiento institucional y pensamiento crítico - A (best)	Enseñar Derecho en tiempos de crisis: inteligencia artificial, debilitamiento institucional y pensamiento crítico - B (medium)	Enseñar Derecho en tiempos de crisis: inteligencia artificial, debilitamiento institucional y pensamiento crítico - C (lowest)
Listening Across Justice Zones *	Listening Across Justice Zones - A (best)	Listening Across Justice Zones - B (medium)	Listening Across Justice Zones - C (lowest)

I authorize the IISL to process my assessment information: *

I authorize the Institute to use the information on the evaluation of applications for the evaluation of proposals received and only for that purpose.

YES

NO

Sending date:

Month

Day

Year

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Math question * 1 + 0 =

More information?

For more information:

Workshop Coordination Team

Avenida de la Universidad, 8
Apartado 28
20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa) - Spain
T: +34 943 78... Ver teléfono
E: workshop@iisj.es

Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Ibarra Zelaia 3 (AHPG) - Apartado 28
20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa)
Spain

Support the IISL

The Institute has received many generous individual donations for a number of years.

Make a donation