WS_2027_Review form_Gert VERSCHRAEGEN, Simon BRONITT, Marta BASILE, Lisa FEATHERSTONE, Maria WERSIG, Matthew GROVES and Nathalie OTROSHI

Name of reviewer: *

Title: "Migration and Rule of Law Backsliding in European Liberal democracies"

COORDINATORS: GERT VERSCHRAEGEN, ELLEN DESMET, ROBIN VANDEVOORDT and MATHIEU LELOUP. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "The Limits of Covert Policing: Comparative and Critical Perspectives"

COORDINATORS: SIMON BRONITT, CLIVE HARFIELD and LISANNE ADAM. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Constructing and governing digital risk for children: a socio-legal comparative inquiry into security, regulation and the Best Interests of the Child"

COORDINATORS: MARTA BASILE, DEBORAH DE FELICE, FANNY VERKAMPT and MATIAS CORDERO. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Socio-legal responses to sexual harms: continuity and change over time and place"

COORDINATORS: LISA FEATHERSTONE, BIANCA FILEBORN, ANDY KALADELFOS and ALANA PIPER. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Abortion Law in Action: Enabling Environments and the Politics of Access"

COORDINATORS: MARIA WERSIG and CATHERINE CONLON. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Administrative Justice in the Digital Age"

COORDINATORS: MATTHEW GROVES and JULIA DAHLVIK. Julia is par of the JUSTICE AND GOVERNANCE / IA Research line.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Reimagining the Fight Against Human Trafficking: A Child-Centred Perspective"

COORDINATORS:NATHALIE OTROSHI and NANDOR KNUST. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Overall scoring: *

Considering my above scores and comments for the applications I was assigned to review, I arrive at the following ranking of the selected applications:

	A (best)	B (medium)	C (lowest)
Migration and Rule of Law Backsliding in European Liberal democracies *	Migration and Rule of Law Backsliding in European Liberal democracies - A (best)	Migration and Rule of Law Backsliding in European Liberal democracies - B (medium)	Migration and Rule of Law Backsliding in European Liberal democracies - C (lowest)
The Limits of Covert Policing: Comparative and Critical Perspectives *	The Limits of Covert Policing: Comparative and Critical Perspectives - A (best)	The Limits of Covert Policing: Comparative and Critical Perspectives - B (medium)	The Limits of Covert Policing: Comparative and Critical Perspectives - C (lowest)
Constructing and governing digital risk for children... *	Constructing and governing digital risk for children... - A (best)	Constructing and governing digital risk for children... - B (medium)	Constructing and governing digital risk for children... - C (lowest)
Socio-legal responses to sexual harms: continuity and change over time and place *	Socio-legal responses to sexual harms: continuity and change over time and place - A (best)	Socio-legal responses to sexual harms: continuity and change over time and place - B (medium)	Socio-legal responses to sexual harms: continuity and change over time and place - C (lowest)
Abortion Law in Action: Enabling Environments and the Politics of Access *	Abortion Law in Action: Enabling Environments and the Politics of Access - A (best)	Abortion Law in Action: Enabling Environments and the Politics of Access - B (medium)	Abortion Law in Action: Enabling Environments and the Politics of Access - C (lowest)
Administrative Justice in the Digital Age *	Administrative Justice in the Digital Age - A (best)	Administrative Justice in the Digital Age - B (medium)	Administrative Justice in the Digital Age - C (lowest)
Reimagining the Fight Against Human Trafficking: A Child-Centred Perspective *	Reimagining the Fight Against Human Trafficking: A Child-Centred Perspective - A (best)	Reimagining the Fight Against Human Trafficking: A Child-Centred Perspective - B (medium)	Reimagining the Fight Against Human Trafficking: A Child-Centred Perspective - C (lowest)

I authorize the IISL to process my assessment information: *

I authorize the Institute to use the information on the evaluation of applications for the evaluation of proposals received and only for that purpose.

YES

NO

Sending date:

Month

Day

Year

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Math question * 3 + 13 =

More information?

For more information:

Workshop Coordination Team

Avenida de la Universidad, 8
Apartado 28
20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa) - Spain
T: +34 943 78... Ver teléfono
E: workshop@iisj.es

Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Ibarra Zelaia 3 (AHPG) - Apartado 28
20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa)
Spain

Support the IISL

The Institute has received many generous individual donations for a number of years.

Make a donation