WS_2027_Review form_Adam CZARNOTA, Elle LEON, Francesco CONTINI, GERARD Conway, Jacqueline MOWBRAY, Mariana RAUPP, Luigi COMINELLI and Fiammetta BONFIGLI

Name of reviewer: *

Title: "The New Right’s Constitutional Challenge: Legal Sociology of Conflict and Compromise"

COORDINATORS: ADAM CZARNOTA and MACIEJ KISILOWSKI. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Linguistic diversity and access to justice"

COORDINATORS: ELLE LEON, MARIE BOURGUIGNON, HEIDI SALAETS, TOM DAEMS and JONATHAN BERNAERTS. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Judicial independence in the age of AI and democratic erosion: risks, pressures, and safeguards"

COORDINATORS: FRANCESCO CONTINI, ULRIKA ANDERSON, MOA BLADINI, ZOLTAN FLECK and SOPHIE TURENNE. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Law, Commons, and the Theory and Practice of Norms"

COORDINATORS: GERARD CONWAY, NIGAR HASHIMZADE and PETER JELFS. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Gender, Law and Parliament in Global Perspective: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue on Voice, Participation and Institutional and Legislative Change / Género, Derecho y Parlamentos desde una Perspectiva Global"

COORDINATORS: JACQUELINE MOWBRAY, KIM RUBENSTEIN and RAMONA VIJEYARASA. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Renewing the Theoretical and Methodological Tools of Research on Punishment and Justice: Scope and Limits of Modern Penal Rationality"

COORDINATORS: MARIANA RAUPP, CAMILO UMAÑA, JOSÉ ROBERTO FRANCO XAVIER and MAIRA ROCHA MACHADO. Camilo is involved in the following research areas: JUSTICE AND GOVERNANCE (and the other five).

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Four Traditions of Socio-Legal Anthropology"

COORDINATORS: LUIGI COMINELLI and GLOVANNI BOMBELLI. None of the organisers are involved in the Institute’s research lines.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Democracy among the rubble: socio-legal strategies against contemporary violence"

COORDINATORS: FIAMMETTA BONFIGLI, FERNANDA MARTINS and AUGUSTO JOBIM DO AMARAL. Fiammetta is part of the HUMAN RIGHTS research line, Fernanda of the IA-HUMAN RIGHTS research line and Augusto of the HUMAN RIGHTS research line.

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Overall scoring: *

Considering my above scores and comments for the applications I was assigned to review, I arrive at the following ranking of the selected applications:

	A (best)	B (medium)	C (lowest)
The New Right’s Constitutional Challenge: Legal Sociology of Conflict and Compromise *	The New Right’s Constitutional Challenge: Legal Sociology of Conflict and Compromise - A (best)	The New Right’s Constitutional Challenge: Legal Sociology of Conflict and Compromise - B (medium)	The New Right’s Constitutional Challenge: Legal Sociology of Conflict and Compromise - C (lowest)
Linguistic diversity and access to justice *	Linguistic diversity and access to justice - A (best)	Linguistic diversity and access to justice - B (medium)	Linguistic diversity and access to justice - C (lowest)
Judicial independence in the age of AI and democratic erosion... *	Judicial independence in the age of AI and democratic erosion... - A (best)	Judicial independence in the age of AI and democratic erosion... - B (medium)	Judicial independence in the age of AI and democratic erosion... - C (lowest)
Law, Commons, and the Theory and Practice of Norms *	Law, Commons, and the Theory and Practice of Norms - A (best)	Law, Commons, and the Theory and Practice of Norms - B (medium)	Law, Commons, and the Theory and Practice of Norms - C (lowest)
Gender, Law and Parliament in Global Perspective *	Gender, Law and Parliament in Global Perspective - A (best)	Gender, Law and Parliament in Global Perspective - B (medium)	Gender, Law and Parliament in Global Perspective - C (lowest)
Renewing the Theoretical and Methodological Tools of Research on Punishment and Justice *	Renewing the Theoretical and Methodological Tools of Research on Punishment and Justice - A (best)	Renewing the Theoretical and Methodological Tools of Research on Punishment and Justice - B (medium)	Renewing the Theoretical and Methodological Tools of Research on Punishment and Justice - C (lowest)
Four Traditions of Socio-Legal Anthropology *	Four Traditions of Socio-Legal Anthropology - A (best)	Four Traditions of Socio-Legal Anthropology - B (medium)	Four Traditions of Socio-Legal Anthropology - C (lowest)
Democracy among the rubble: socio-legal strategies against contemporary violence *	Democracy among the rubble: socio-legal strategies against contemporary violence - A (best)	Democracy among the rubble: socio-legal strategies against contemporary violence - B (medium)	Democracy among the rubble: socio-legal strategies against contemporary violence - C (lowest)

I authorize the IISL to process my assessment information: *

I authorize the Institute to use the information on the evaluation of applications for the evaluation of proposals received and only for that purpose.

YES

NO

Sending date:

Month

Day

Year

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Math question * 14 + 4 =

More information?

For more information:

Workshop Coordination Team

Avenida de la Universidad, 8
Apartado 28
20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa) - Spain
T: +34 943 78... Ver teléfono
E: workshop@iisj.es

Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Ibarra Zelaia 3 (AHPG) - Apartado 28
20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa)
Spain

Support the IISL

The Institute has received many generous individual donations for a number of years.

Make a donation